🧠 Smarter Retaining Wall Design: Introducing Pile Support in Version 1.8.3
- Adisorn O.
- Oct 3
- 2 min read
Retaining walls remain a core element in geotechnical engineering, but their design has often relied on manual iterations, conservative estimates, and simplified base support assumptions. That changes with Version 1.8.3 of our AI-optimized cantilever wall platform, now enhanced with two-row pile support modeling—making it more powerful, accurate, and adaptable to real-world conditions like soft soil or limited bearing capacity.

🆕 What’s New in Version 1.8.3?
💡 Two-Pile Support System with Equilibrium Constraints
This version replaces the traditional bearing pressure check with a force-based model using two piles:
R1 (at distance a from the toe)
R2 (at a + x8 from the toe)
The optimizer solves the following equilibrium conditions:
Moment equilibrium: R1·a − R2·(a+x8) = Mdrive − Mresist − Wsum·x̄
Vertical force balance: R1 + R2 = Wsum
It also enforces the geometric constraint:
a + x8 + a = toe + heel + stem_thick = x3 + x4 + x5
🎯 Objective-Driven Optimization
The JAYA algorithm searches for the best set of design variables:
x2: Base thickness
x3: Toe length
x4: Heel length
x5: Wall thickness at base
x6: Wall thickness at top
The optimizer minimizes:
Total concrete volume
Total steel weight
Or overall cost, depending on user choice
📐 Realistic Structural Checks with Pile Reactions
Unlike previous versions that estimated bending/shear using assumed bearing stress, v1.8.3 uses the actual pile reactions R1 and R2 to compute:
Bending moments at toe and heel (with load factor x1.6)
Shear forces along the wall stem (with load factor x1.6)
Shear checks using τ = Vu / (b·d) and compared to ACI318-19 shear strength requirements
This ensures the design reflects true support conditions, especially valuable for walls supported on soft clay or deep foundations.
🧱 Graphical Plot: From Abstract to Insight
The plot now includes:
Base, stem, soil zones
Pile positions with reaction values (R1, R2)
Fully labeled geometry
Real-time updates across iterations
🧾 Final Output Includes:
Optimal geometry and design variables
Concrete volume and steel weight (kg/m)
Pile reactions and spacing
Moment and force summaries
Plot and history graph of objective

📘 Why It Matters
Traditional retaining wall design may fall short when:
Soil bearing capacity is too low
Structural load demands are high
Construction on soft, compressible strata is required
This update allows engineers to model real-world supports via piles and automatically find cost-effective geometries that satisfy all physical and safety constraints.

